The X Factor


I mention the X factor occasionally in my teaching, and it is mentioned in one of my upcoming books. It is a term I first heard a colleague at Brevard use in reference to his instrument, a classic one with a classic tone. It gave him the X factor.

I use the term primarily to indicate the difference between a workmanlike performance–one that is good and clean but somewhat bland–and an artistic performance. What you must strive for is a performance that has a great tone with that little bit of extra style and nuance.

Another way I sometimes word it to students is that, right or wrong, there is a difference between the playing of a principal hornist and a section hornist, at least in our imagination. A good section player can and should be able to lead and match with great style, of course, but may not reach quite that level due to choices of equipment, articulations, tone color, etc.

JOHN ERICSON has wide-ranging experience as an orchestral player, soloist, and teacher.» About John Ericson » More articles » Horn Notes Edition » Contact

Related to this article


  • 100% Accuracy
    My faculty recital at ASU went well overall yesterday; certainly I am happy with the sound and general effect. Still, it was not perfect. Thinking back to previous performances there have been lots of good ones but only one note perfect major solo performance comes to...
  • Play Long Phrases when Warming Up
    An observation in the Randall Faust group warm-up session at the recent Keith Johnson horn retirement event was that I found myself playing longer phrases than most of the other other players present. It is easy on the horn to get by “under the radar” with...

Comments ()


John Ericson & Bruce Hembd
on the French horn, brass related topics, and the field of classical music.